Skip to main content

Bruce Atkinson

Corryong Cup 2025 · Task 4 (Open) (Sat, 11 Jan 2025) · open · ranked #22 · times in Australia/Melbourne (GMT+11)

Scores computed

Made goal in 2:00:18 — 455.6 points

Loading map...

The flight

What the tracklog shows, and which crossings scored.

How this works

Start time taken: gate 1 of 6 — the last start gate at or before the crossing. The speed-section clock runs from the gate, not from the crossing (FAI S7F §8.3.1).12:15:00
Completed the task — full task distance is credited.

Day quality — points on offer

Task validity 89.58% of a perfect day, so 895.8 of 1000 points were available.

How this works

Launch validity — the day counts for less if much of the field never got into the air.100%

48 pilots flew out of 48 present. Nominal launch is 96%, so launch validity is full once 47 pilots are in the air.

Distance validity — the day counts for less if the field as a whole did not get far.100%

Measured against a 35.0 km nominal distance, a 30% nominal goal and a 5.0 km minimum distance. The field flew 45.3 km past the minimum on average, with a best of 58.4 km.

How far the field got — the spread distance validity is computed from, one dot per pilot. 48 pilots flew; you flew 58.4 km, further than 13 of them. The day averaged 45.3 km past the 5.0 km minimum, against a 35.0 km nominal distance.
Time validity — the day counts for less if the fastest pilot got round much quicker than the task was meant to take.89.58%

The fastest pilot took 1:02:57 against a nominal task time of 1:30:00 — 70% of nominal.

Points on offer for the day895.8 pts

1000 × 1.00 × 1.00 × 0.8958 = 895.8

Split between the components: 35 of 48 pilots made goal — a goal ratio of 0.73

distance 330.7 · time 395.6 · leading 98.9 · arrival 70.6

The share each component takes of the day

distance 36.9% · time 44.2% · leading 11.0% · arrival 7.9%

Distance points

330.7 of 330.7 pts

Full distance — one of 35 pilots in goal

How this works

Task distance58.4 km

The optimized task line — the shortest legal way round the turnpoints.

Scored distance58.4 km

Measured along the optimized task line, up to the furthest point on course.

Best distance in class58.4 km
Made goal — full available distance points.330.7 pts
The curve is the distance-points formula, half of it built from where the field landed out (FAI S7F §11.1.1) — every dot is a pilot, sitting exactly on it. Its steepest stretches are the ones fewest pilots got past, so flying through one is worth more than the same distance somewhere easy. You flew 58.4 km of the class best 58.4 km, worth 330.7 of 330.7.

Time points

22.2 of 395.6 pts

27th fastest of 35 through the speed section

How this works

Time points use the 5⁄6 speed-fraction exponent (the current FAI S7F, S7F §11.2).
Your speed section time2:00:18

Timed from your 12:15:00 start gate to the end of the speed section (FAI S7F §8.7) — you crossed the start at 12:16:04.

Fastest time in class1:02:57

Set by Scott Barrett — you were 57:21 behind.

Time points fall off with the gap to the fastest time22.2 pts

speed fraction = max(0, 1 − ((T − Tbest) ÷ √Tbest)^5⁄6) = 0.056; × 395.6 available = 22.2 (times in hours)

The curve is the time-points formula — every dot is a pilot, sitting exactly on it. You were 57:21 behind the fastest time, which cost 373.4 of the 395.6 time points on offer.

Leading points

70.3 of 98.9 pts

8th best of 45 measured leading coefficients

How this works

Leading points reward flying out front during the speed section — the pilot with the best leading coefficient takes all available leading points, others fall off with the gap.70.3 pts
Your leading coefficient — the area under your distance-over-time curve, so lower means further ahead for longer1.454

Best in class 1.278.

Leading points fall off with the gap to the best coefficient70.3 pts

leading factor = max(0, 1 − ((LC − LCbest)² ÷ LCbest)^1⁄3) = 0.711; × 98.9 available = 70.3

Measured with the classic squared-distance leading coefficient (S7F §11.3.1, the hang-gliding / GAP2016–2018 variant).
The curve is the leading-points formula — every dot is a pilot, sitting exactly on it. Your coefficient of 1.454 against the class best of 1.278 puts you at 70.3 of 98.9.

Arrival points

32.5 of 70.6 pts

13th of 35 to the end of the speed section

How this works

Arrival points reward crossing the end of the speed section early relative to the other pilots who reached it.32.5 pts
Reached the end of the speed section 13th of 3514:15:18

The arrival order is by the clock at the end of the speed section, not by speed — an earlier start gate can put a slower pilot ahead of a faster one here.

Arrival points fall off steeply with each place32.5 pts

arrival ratio = 1 − (13 − 1) ÷ 35 = 0.657; arrival factor = 0.2 + 0.037·r + 0.13·r² + 0.633·r³ = 0.460; × 70.6 available = 32.5

One place earlier would have been worth 2.2 more points

The curve is front-loaded: first place takes all 70.6 available, and everyone else who reaches the end of the speed section keeps at least 14.2 of them.

The curve is the arrival-points formula — every dot is a pilot, sitting exactly on it. You arrived 13 of 35, worth 32.5 of 70.6 — one place earlier would have been 2.2 more. The order is by the clock at the end of the speed section, not by speed.

Total

455.6 of 895.8 pts

How this works

Distance + time + leading + arrival, minus penalties455.6 pts

330.7 + 22.2 + 70.3 + 32.5 ≈ 455.6 — the points above are shown rounded to 0.1; the total is rounded from their exact sum.

Where the points went

Your 455.6 against the 750.3 that won the class.

How this works

Distancelevel

you 330.7, the leader 330.7

Time−373.4 pts

you 22.2, the leader 395.6

Leading+70.3 pts

you 70.3, the leader 0

Arrival+8.5 pts

you 32.5, the leader 24

Behind Scott Barrett−294.7 pts

You took 373.4 fewer time-points than the leader — more than the whole gap — and won 78.8 back on leading-points and arrival-points.